36 International Journal of Engineering Insights, (2023) 1:1
sales link for users to purchase products in a more color-
ful manner, which aligns with the work’s focus. Finally,
[16] also obtained an acceptance rate of 100% for all
projects because they aim to create a more dynamic
and publicity-oriented website for businesses, empha-
sizing clarity and user-friendliness. In conclusion, we
have a successful track record in sales as we strive to
increase advertising within businesses.
Table 5 Comparative Results
Attributes [13] [14] [15] [16]
Efficiency 94% 95% 70% 95%
Satisfaction 92% 91% 88% 89%
Errors 9% 9% 45% 10%
Learning capacity 89% 94% 89% 96%
Acceptance 90% 97% 70% 99%
5 Conclusions
The work carried out for the design of web pages has
proven to be effective as it improves the user interface.
Easy access to the digital platforms of each business was
optimally executed, making it dynamic and providing
all kinds of information required about the entity. The
use of the software was developed using Notepad++. It
offers three information options, including a bit of the
company’s history, products, and contact information
for inquiries. The company location is also provided.
In comparison with other researched works, we con-
clude that we all have a common thread of work to fol-
low to ensure that the web page is user-friendly. I con-
ducted an analysis of specific questions that were posed
to three people from the company. In future work, the
goal is to use this website with more users and modify
the interface design for a better user experience and a
more impressive and recommended display.
Acknowledgements Special thanks to CICHE Research Cen-
ter and SISAu Research Group of the Universidad Indoam´erica
for the support in this research. The results of this work are
part of the project “Education 4.0 applied to the teaching of
skills STEAM”. This work was supported in part by collabo-
ration with the REDTPI4.0 CYTED program.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of inter-
est.
References
1. D. Metaxa-Kakavouli, K. Wang, J. A. Landay, and
J. Hancock, “Gender-inclusive design: Sense of belonging
and bias in web interfaces,” in Proceedings of the
2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems, ser. CHI ’18. New York, NY, USA: Association
for Computing Machinery, 2018, p. 1–6. [Online].
Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174188
2. H. Kaindl, “Modelgenguis – high-level interaction
design with discourse models for automated gui
generation,” in 26th International Conference on
Intelligent User Interfaces - Companion, ser. IUI ’21
Companion. New York, NY, USA: Association for
Computing Machinery, 2021, p. 3–4. [Online]. Available:
https://doi.org/10.1145/3397482.3450619
3. Y. Hwang, D. Shin, J. Eun, B. Suh, and J. Lee, “Design
guidelines of computer-based intervention for computer
vision syndrome: Focus group study and in-the-wild de-
ployment,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 23,
03 2021.
4. B. Myers, S. E. Hudson, and R. Pausch, “Past, present,
and future of user interface software tools,” ACM
Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 3–28,
mar 2000. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/
344949.344959
5. G. R. Mattiello and A. T. Endo, “Model-based
testing leveraged for automated web tests,” Software
Quality Journal, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 621–649, 9 2022.
[Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.
1007/s11219-021-09575-w
6. C. Garc´ıa Cena, R. Saltar´en, J. L´opez Bl´azquez, and
R. Aracil, “Desarrollo de una interfaz de usuario para el
sistema rob´otico multiagente smart,” Revista Iberoamer-
icana de Autom´atica e Inform´atica Industrial RIAI,
vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 17–27, 2010.
7. L. Kuo, T. Chang, and C.-C. Lai, “Multimedia webpage
visual design and color emotion test,” Multimedia Tools
Appl., vol. 81, no. 2, p. 2621–2636, jan 2022. [Online].
Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11684-4
8. A. Soto, H. Mora, and J. A. Riascos, “Web generator: An
open-source software for synthetic web-based user inter-
face dataset generation,” SoftwareX, vol. 17, p. 100985,
2022.
9. A. Kumar and A. Arora, “An ANFIS-based compatibility
scorecard for IoT integration in websites,” Journal of
Supercomputing, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 2568–2596, 4 2020.
[Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.
1007/s11227-019-03026-x
10. R. Berari, A. Tauteanu, D. Fichou, P. Brie, M. Dogariu,
L. Stefan, M. G. Constantin, and B. Ionescu, “Overview
of the 2021 imageclefdrawnui task: Detection and
recognition of hand drawn and digital website uis,”
in Proceedings of the Working Notes of CLEF 2021
- Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum,
Bucharest, Romania, September 21st - to - 24th, 2021,
ser. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, G. Faggioli, N. Ferro,
A. Joly, M. Maistro, and F. Piroi, Eds., vol. 2936.
CEUR-WS.org, 2021, pp. 1121–1132. [Online]. Available:
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2936/paper-89.pdf
11. W. J. Yamada, M. Morandini, T. A. Coleti, and C. R.
S. C. Barbosa, “Development of a generator system of
parameterized questionnaires to evaluate the usability of
web pages,” in HCI International 2019 – Late Break-
ing Papers: 21st HCI International Conference, HCII
2019, Orlando, FL, USA, July 26–31, 2019, Proceedings.
Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2019, p. 85–100.
12. L. Dombrovskaia and A. Vilches, “Guideline for web
pages design inclusive for senior users,” in 2021 40th In-
ternational Conference of the Chilean Computer Science
Society (SCCC), 2021, pp. 1–7.