Methodological proposal for the integration of agile methodologies and PMBOK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61961/injei.v1i1.4Keywords:
Management, project, agile, practices, PmbokAbstract
Proper project management is a constant need faced by most organizations worldwide. There is a growing focus on combining PMBOK practices with agile principles, creating a hybrid approach that leverages the best of both worlds. In this sense this paper proposes to deepen and combine the most effective elements of the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®) with the agile approach to project management. This is done taking into account that an adequate project management will allow aligning the organization's objectives and generating value for all parties involved. As a result, it is expected to obtain optimal conclusions from the development of the project and achieve the best results from the application of AGILE+ PMBOK® best practices. This will serve as a proposal for other organizations in the sector to continue evolving their management practices.
Downloads
References
M. E. Arteaga and M. R. Pazmiño Castro, “Uso de Buenas Prácticas en la Gestión de Proyectos de TI,” INNOVA Res. Journal, ISSN-e 2477-9024, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2018, págs. 49-59, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 49–59, 2018, Accessed: Nov. 06, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6324891&info=resumen&idioma=SPA
A. ul Musawir, C. E. M. Serra, O. Zwikael, and I. Ali, “Project governance, benefit management, and project success: Towards a framework for supporting organizational strategy implementation,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1658–1672, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2017.07.007.
L. S. Cardona-Meza and G. Olivar-Tost, “Modeling and Simulation of Project Management through the PMBOK® Standard Using Complex Networks,” Complexity, vol. 2017, 2017, doi: 10.1155/2017/4791635.
H. Kerzner, Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. John Wiley & Sons, 2022.
H. Wells, “How Effective Are Project Management Methodologies? An Explorative Evaluation of Their Benefits in Practice,” https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21302, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 43–58, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1002/PMJ.21302.
P. Fitsilis, “Comparing PMBOK and Agile Project Management software development processes,” Adv. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., pp. 378–383, 2008, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8741-7_68.
W. Richter, “PMBOK vs. agile methods: How cultural change can become transparent,” 2015 IEEE Eighth Int. Conf. Softw. Testing, Verif. Valid. Work., pp. 1–2, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1109/ICSTW.2015.7107413.
P. Rosenberger and J. Tick, “Suitability of PMBOK 6th edition for agile-developed IT Projects,” 18th IEEE Int. Symp. Comput. Intell. Informatics, CINTI 2018 - Proc., pp. 241–245, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1109/CINTI.2018.8928226.
“The Chaos Report: Agile y el éxito en proyectos de TI | Scrum Colombia.” https://scrumcolombia.org/the-chaos-report-agile-y-el-exito-en-los-proyectos-de-ti/ (accessed Jul. 25, 2023).
“Revisión Standish Group - CHAOS 2020: Beyond Infinity | Blog de Henny Portman.” https://hennyportman.wordpress.com/2021/01/06/review-standish-group-chaos-2020-beyond-infinity/ (accessed Nov. 02, 2021).
S. El-Sabaa, “The skills and career path of an effective project manager,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00034-4.
M. Fowler and J. Highsmith, “The Agile Manifesto,” 2001, Accessed: Jul. 31, 2023. [Online]. Available: www.martinfowler.com/articles/newMethodology.html
L. A. Henriquez and V. A. Henriquez, “Propuesta de implementación del modelo EFQM en la Universidad de Guayaquil basado en la revisión de la literatura,” Rev. Espac., vol. 40, no. 29, 2019.
M. M. Moe, “Comparative Study of Test-Driven Development TDD, Behavior-Driven Development BDD and Acceptance Test--Driven Development ATDD,” Int. J. Trend Sci. Res. Dev., pp. 231–234, 2019, Accessed: Aug. 01, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
P. Fitsilis, “Comparing PMBOK and agile project management software development processes,” Adv. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., pp. 378–383, 2008, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8741-7_68/COVER.
Project Management Institute, Project management body of knowledge (pmbok guide). 2001. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2023. [Online]. Available: www.PMI.org/Marketplace
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Francisco Javier Galora Silva, Alex V. Nuñez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
